Legal Opinion

Hedges v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1963No. 36304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

61 Wn.2d 418 (1963)

379 P.2d 199

DANIEL HEDGES et al., Respondents,

v.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.[*]

No. 36304.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

February 7, 1963.

Richard L. Gemson, for appellant.

Herbert H. Freise and Cashatt, Williams, Connelly & Rekofke, for respondents.

ROSELLINI, J.

The plaintiff wife, while a passenger on one of the defendant's trains and walking near the forward door of the dining car, was thrown to the floor by a violent jerk or jolt which occurred when an axle journal broke, causing a portion of the undercarriage to…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Finley; Concurrence · Weaver.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Morner v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Walters v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kemalyan v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Firebaugh v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Suburban Transportation SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rathvon v. Columbia Pacific AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Kaiser v. Suburban Transportation SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API