Legal Opinion
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 1944No. 31094PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is a suit to cancel an oil and gas lease insofar as it covers a tract consisting of 1.47 acres. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company and its trustees, canceling the lease as to the 1.47 acres on the ground of abandonment, the defendant, Magnolia Petroleum Company, owner of the oil and gas lease thereon, has appealed.
In 1916, a departmental oil and gas lease in favor of F. M. Bailey as lessee and covering 160 acres of land near the town of Cement was executed by the owners, who were restricted Indians, and was approved by the Secretary of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Galt v. MetscherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Ramsey Petroleum Corporation v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- McKenna v. NichlosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Ferguson v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- White v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- White v. ConocoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. 79.95 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Texas Consolidated Oils v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Kunc v. Harper-Turner Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.