Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1969No. Civ. 11755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanes, J.

Judgment was entered in favor of respondent Franchise Tax Board on separate causes joined in a suit for refund of state personal income taxes paid by appellants. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 19082. ) The matter was submitted to the superior court upon an agreed statement of facts.

Facts: The Andrews Case

Appellant William S. Andrews was a member of a partnership which had adopted a fiscal year ending August 31. In November 1958 and March 1959, the partnership sold certain properties which had been held more than five but not more than ten years, showing a long-term partnership gain; amounting to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lámar v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Misasi v. W. C. JacobsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Rihn v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Altsuler v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Dery v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Newman v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Delucchi v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API