Legal Opinion

Delucchi v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 2009No. C056503Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

Plaintiffs (the individuals, couples, and other entities listed in exhibit A of the complaint as the signatories on 58 state tax returns) brought the present action for a refund of approximately $17,000 each in state income tax that they had paid on the balance of proceeds received in 1995 from their 1986 sale of stock. The trial court ruled in favor of defendant Franchise Tax Board (FTB) on cross-motions for summary judgment on stipulated facts. Having timely appealed from the judgment, plaintiffs contend that the FTB must apply the exclusion from taxable income that existed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Snell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Nicholas Picchione v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  5. Sirbo Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API