Legal Opinion
Emlenton Refining Co. v. Chambers
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 8, 1926No. 3435PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Three suits involving the same contracts were instituted against the defendant by the same plaintiffs in different characters. They were brought in the order and, abbreviated for convenience, were entitled as follows:(1) Chambers, for the use of Adams, v. Emlenton Refining Company.(2) Adams (averring that Chambers was his agent) v. Emlenton Refining Company.(3) Chambers, for the use of Adams, v. Emlenton Refining Company.
In the first action a voluntary nonsuit was entered; in the second, a judgment for the defendant on a verdict; the third, the instant case, is still…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Union Pac. R. v. SyasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Fay v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry. & Motor Coach Employees v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Lewis Invisible Stitch MacH. Co. v. Columbia Blindstitch MacH. Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Cox v. Graves, Knight & Graves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Street & Smith Publications, Inc. v. SpikesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.