Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Bartlett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1898No. 18,490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

This was a suit by the appellant to rescind, for fraud and false representation, a contract under which the appellant purchased from the appellees a certain horse, and, in payment therefor, executed to the appellees his promissory note.

The only question urged for the reversal of the judgment of the circuit court is upon the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. An objection to our entering upon a consideration of the question is made because of the contention that the evidence introduced at the trial is not in the *694record. The record…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tate v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hamrick v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Citizens' Street Railroad v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Ruddick's Adm'r v. Ruddick's Adm'rIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jackman Cigar Manufacturing Co. v. John Berger & Son Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Morton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API