Legal Opinion

Ruddick's Adm'r v. Ruddick's Adm'r

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Jackson Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

There was suit in the Jackson Common Pleas. The plaintiff in that suit recovered a thousand dollars. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. The motion was based upon alleged newly discovered evidence.

After the trial, but within a year thereafter, the defendant filed his petition for a new trial on account of additional newly discovered evidence. The Court sustained a demurrer to the petition, and refused the new trial. The evidence heard on the original trial is not placed before this Court. How, therefore, can this Court say whether there ought to be a new trial or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Morton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Omaha, Niobrara, & Black Hills Railroad v. O'DonnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Cooper v. BartlettIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API