Legal Opinion
Barker v. Halliburton Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 30, 2008No. Civil Action H-07-2677PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Order and Opinion
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, to stay proceedings, and for imposition of sanctions. Dkt. 40. Upon consideration of the motion, response, reply, surreplies, and the applicable law, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Background
On July 22, 2004, Tracy Barker signed an employment agreement with one of the defendants, Service Employees International (collectively “the Halliburton defendants”) and, in September 2004, went to work in Baghdad, Iraq as a civilian contractor in the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Jones v. Halliburton Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Perez v. LEMARROYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Cassaday v. KBR, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Jones v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.