Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Cassaday v. KBR, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 16, 2008No. Civil Action H-07-1485PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, to Sever, and to Stay Arbitrable Claims. Having considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines Defendants’ motion should be granted.
BACKGROUND
In this qui tam lawsuit, Plaintiff-Relator Frank M. Cassaday (“Cassaday”), a former employee of Service Employees International, Inc. (“SEII”), asserts violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against Defendants KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root, Inc., and SEII (collectively, “KBR”). 1…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Hagerty v. Cyberonics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Andresen v. Intepros Federal, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Etheridge v. AT&T, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2022