Legal Opinion

Jones v. Halliburton Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 9, 2008No. Civil Action 4:07-cv-2719PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings. 1 After considering the parties’ submissions, arguments presented at a hearing on the pending motion, and the relevant law, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion, Doc. No. 45, should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the Court will not compel to arbitration Plaintiffs claims for assault and battery; intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of the alleged assault; negligent hiring, retention, and supervision of…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Innova Hospital San Antonio, L.P. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  2. Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Jones v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Delirium TV LLC v. Tran Dang, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API