Legal Opinion

Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1926No. 17035PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, C.

The parties will he referred to in this opinion as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

On the 26th day of June, 1925, the plaintiff's, as taxpayers of Creek county, and of various municipalities of said county, commenced an action in the district court of Creek county against James E. Payne, county treasurer, as defendant. While the suit was pending the term of office of said James E. Payne expired, and the defendant Ralph H. Blake, his successor, was substituted as a defendant in said cause.

The plaintiffs paid the full amount of 1924 taxes…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Protest of BledsoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Protest of DowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Protest of TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Franklin v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API