State v. Youngblood
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
In this appeal on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Larry Youngblood once again argues for reversal of his convictions for child molestation, sexual assault and kidnapping because evidence crucial to his defense was lost.
We find that Youngblood was deprived of a fair trial and denied due process of law under the Arizona Constitution and well-established Arizona case law because the failure to preserve certain evidence resulted in prejudice to him. We reverse his convictions and the sentences imposed, and dismiss the case.
FACTS
David, the ten-year-old victim,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. TreadawayArizona Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. TiedemannUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.