Legal Opinion
Muriel Siebert & Co. v. Intuit Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 17, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*285Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered November 10, 2005, which granted plaintiffs motion to disqualify defendant’s counsel, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the motion denied and the matter remanded for further proceedings. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered December 29, 2005, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendant’s motion for renewal, unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs.
Supreme Court erred in disqualifying defense counsel on the basis of counsel’s ex parte…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rossi v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Saftler v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Muriel Siebert & Co. v. Intuit Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pellegrino v. Oppenheimer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Optic Plus Enterprises, Ltd. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Fewer v. GFI Group Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lyons v. LyonsNew York Supreme Court · 2015