Legal Opinion
United States v. Eugene Mastropieri, Herbert Pate and Carolyn Pate
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 20, 1982No. 1060, 1061, Dockets 81-1017, 81-1019PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
In this trial before Judge Mishler and a jury in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Herbert Pate, his wife Carolyn, and his attorney, Eugene Mastropieri, were convicted of a number of offenses growing out of the alleged filing of false income tax returns (or, in one instance, failure to file a return) by the Pates for the years 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974 and 1975. The trial was on three separate indictments, 78 Cr. 219, 79 Cr. 238 and 80 Cr. 174.
The first indictment was limited to charging the Pates with willfully and knowingly attempting to defraud…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-VegaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.