Legal Opinion

Fiddelman v. Redmon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 22, 2000No. AC 18920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Popcorn Redmon, appeals from postjudgment orders effectuating portions of a dissolution of marriage judgment relating to the disposition of the former marital home owned by Redmon and the plaintiff, Donald Fiddelman. The plaintiff contends that intervening events have rendered the appeal moot. We agree and dismiss the appeal.

The parties were divorced in 1991 and the dissolution judgment provided that the parties’ jointly owned home was to be sold, and that the defendant was to be paid $250,000 from the proceeds.1 Claiming that the defendant’s refusal to cooperate had…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Sobocinski v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hechtman v. SavitskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of East WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Champagne v. ChampagneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Morgan v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Pryor v. PryorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API