Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Morgan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 25, 2012No. AC 33939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*809 Opinion
2Per curiam
In this dissolution action, the self-represented plaintiff, Susan L. Morgan, appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering her to sell real property known as 3 East Pattagansett Road in Niantic (property). The nature of her appeal is twofold. The plaintiff first raises a bevy of claims challenging the propriety of the order requiring her to sell the property. In addition, the plaintiff asks this court to assess monetary damages against the self-represented defendant, Jay T. Morgan, for injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of her compliance with that order. We dismiss…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bhatia v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Patterson v. Council on Probate Judicial ConductSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Pryor v. PryorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016