Legal Opinion

No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1987No. B019246PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DEVICH, J.

This appeal presents several questions concerning the validity of three ordinances (sometimes hereafter referred to as drilling ordinances) which permit exploratory oil drilling and, should that prove successful, transportation of the oil by pipeline.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation (hereafter Occidental) and City of Los Angeles (hereafter City) appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandate commanding the setting aside of the drilling ordinances enacted by the Los Angeles City Council (hereafter City Council), enjoining any activity dependent upon these ordinances, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Al Larson Boat Shop, Inc. v. Board of Harbor CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API