Legal Opinion

John E. Branagh & Sons v. Witcosky

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1966No. Civ. 22255PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Cross-defendant George E. Witcosky, doing business as Tara Manufacturing Company, a subcontractor, hereinafter referred to as Tara, has appealed from a judgment which awarded cross-complainant John E. Branagh & Sons, a general contractor, hereinafter referred to as Branagh, indemnification for the sum of $24,142.28 which was paid by Branagh in satisfaction of one-half the amount of judgments obtained against Tara and Branagh by an employee of another subcontractor and the latter’s workmen’s compensation insurance carrier, and for the additional sum of $10,480.68 for attorneys’ fees, court…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Spence & Howe Construction Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smoketree-Lake Murray, Ltd. v. Mills Concrete Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Continental Heller v. AMTECH MECHANICAL SERV.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. County of San Joaquin v. Stockton Swim ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Davidson v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Burlingame Motor Co. v. Peninsula Activities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API