Simmons v. City of Moscow
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBistline, Justice
**
I concur in Justice Huntley’s opinion for the Court, except for that portion which supplants the district court’s determination of the “benefit derived” issue.
Briefly I will point out our difference. A requirement of the L.I.D. code is that assessments must be against “property benefited by the making of the improvements.” I.C. § 50-1703(b). Section 50-1707(c) provides (inferentially) that benefits by improvements will be according to:(1) A front foot method(2) A square foot method(3) A combination of (1) and (2), or(4) In proportion to benefits derived by improvements to the property.
We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. Hayden Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State, by Mondale v. MecklenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Zuelch v. DroegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953