Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Severson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1991No. 87-13614; CA A63131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer has petitioned for review of our decision, 105 Or App 67, 803 P2d 1203 (1990), arguing that we erred in concluding that the Workers’ Compensation Board had authority to award attorney fees under ORS 656.382(1) for services rendered in a vocational assistance proceeding before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Finance. We treat the petition as a petition for reconsideration, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified. ORAP 9.15.

Employer correctly asserts that we erred in stating that whether to award attorney fees is a “matter concerning a claim.” 105 Or App at 71.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saxton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Harrington v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. SAIF Corp. v. SeversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lasley v. Ontario RenderingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Colclasure v. Washington County School District No. 48-JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API