Legal Opinion

Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1986No. WCB 83-06463; CA A37168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Worker’s Compensation Board (Board) which denied his attorney a fee for defending the referee’s order after SAIF initiated a review. Claimant filed a claim for a cervical spine condition. Before the hearing, the parties had resolved all issues on the claim except for the amount of the fee claimant’s attorney was entitled to recover; that was the only issue presented to the referee. The referee found that $2,000 was a reasonable fee and ordered that SAIF pay that sum to claimant’s attorney. SAIF requested that the Board review the order, arguing that…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saxton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Strazi v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Harrington v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API