Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Worker’s Compensation Board (Board) which denied his attorney a fee for defending the referee’s order after SAIF initiated a review. Claimant filed a claim for a cervical spine condition. Before the hearing, the parties had resolved all issues on the claim except for the amount of the fee claimant’s attorney was entitled to recover; that was the only issue presented to the referee. The referee found that $2,000 was a reasonable fee and ordered that SAIF pay that sum to claimant’s attorney. SAIF requested that the Board review the order, arguing that…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Saxton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Strazi v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Harrington v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.