Legal Opinion

Sensory Neurostimulation, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 16, 2020No. 19-55036PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SENSORY NEUROSTIMULATION, INC., No. 19-55036 a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:18-cv-00180- and CJC-JDE FRED BURBANK, MD, CEO, President, Board Chairman, and OPINION stock holder, Plaintiff, v. ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, Defendants-Appellees, and SEEMA VERMA, Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; DEMETRIOS…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  2. B. v. Brooks-LasureDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Beitzel v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Beltran v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. Biotechnology Innovation Organization v. Alex M. Azar, IIDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API