Legal Opinion

Biotechnology Innovation Organization v. Alex M. Azar, II

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 28, 2020No. 3:20-cv-08603Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES Case No. 20-cv-08603-VC ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. Re: Dkt. No. 27 CENTER FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, et al., Defendants. The motion for a preliminary injunction is granted based on the government’s failure to complete the notice and comment procedures required by the Administrative Procedure Act. The government is enjoined from implementing the rule pending completion of those procedures. The recent ruling by Judge Catherine Blake thoroughly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Sensory Neurostimulation, Inc. v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. City & County of S.F. v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API