Legal Opinion
Wildlife Express Corporation v. Carol Wright Sales, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 11, 1994No. 92-3274PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Wildlife Express Corporation (“Wildlife”) brought an action against Carol Wright Sales, Inc. (“Carol Wright”) to recover damages for infringement of various copyrighted animal-styled children’s duffle bags. The magistrate judge, sitting with the consent of the parties as the district court, found that Carol Wright had infringed, willfully or with reckless disregard, Wildlife’s copyrights of the sculptured bear, duck and elephant duffle bags and awarded statutory damages in the amount of $50,000 per copyright infringement. Carol Wright appeals/ For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Johnny McClendon Jr. v. Indiana Sugars, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Estate of Phillips v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- La Resolana Architects, PA v. Reno, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Barboza v. New Form, Inc. (In Re Barboza)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.