Legal Opinion
Borescopes R US v. 1800Endoscope. Com, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 26, 2010No. 3-09-00102PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, Borescopes R US, a Tennessee sole proprietorship, filed this action under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a), the federal trademark statute, against Defendant, 1800Endoscope.com, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, asserting claims of trademark-infringement and unfair-competition under federal law, unfair-competition under Tennessee common law, and violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-18-101 et seq.
The parties operate competing businesses selling borescopes and market and sell their…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PSK, LLC v. HicklinDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
- Booking.com. B v. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Booking.com. B v. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- SB Initiative, Inc. v. Cheekwood Botanical Garden and Museum of ArtDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024