Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mullen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant filed suit against Appellee for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. Appellee admitted liability. The jury awarded damages in the amount of $4,218.44. Appellant moved for the grant of a new trial. The trial court denied the motion. Appellant filed this timely appeal.

¶ 2 The accident occurred when Appellee fell asleep at the wheel, crossed the center line of a highway and struck Appellant’s truck with his vehicle, causing Appellant’s truck to travel up an embankment and turn over on its side. After the accident, Appellant was transported, via ambulance,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Krivijanski v. Union RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Dougherty v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Catalano v. BujakCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Fischer v. TroianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. McDermott v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Amadou, K. v. Sarver, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API