Commonwealth v. Steward
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the order suppressing evidence obtained pursuant to a wiretap against defendants, Joseph Steward and Herbert Pearson. We reverse and remand for trial. 1
¶ 2 In February 2000, a wiretap on Rick Rodgers’ phone led police to suspect that Steward and Pearson were supplying Rodgers with drugs. On March 23, 2000, after the wiretap on Rodgers’ phone expired, police applied for and obtained a warrant to wiretap Steward’s phone. Steward and Pearson were subsequently arrested and charged with delivery of a controlled substance, possession with intent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChernoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SodomskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. SodomskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Com. v. Greenawalt, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Grier, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Lambert, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.