Commonwealth v. Chernosky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
¶ 1 This appeal by the Commonwealth is from the trial court’s decision to grant a motion to suppress evidence filed by Ap-pellee, Kimberly Chernosky. We reverse.
¶ 2 Initially, we examine the pertinent standard of review:
When the Commonwealth appeals from a suppression order, we follow a clearly defined standard of review and consider only the evidence from the defendant’s witnesses together with the evidence of the prosecution that, when read in the *125context of the entire record, remains uncontradicted. The suppression court’s findings of fact bind an appellate court if the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. KenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. DommelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. EnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.