Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rodgers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MeCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, the Commonwealth asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in granting a defense motion to suppress physical evidence seized by law enforcement officers in California pursuant to a search warrant issued there which was based in part upon information obtained by Pennsylvania law enforcement officers from intercepted telephone conversations. The trial court concluded that the Commonwealth had failed to provide probable cause for the issuance of the order authorizing the non-consensual interception because the Commonwealth had not shown that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChernoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. DotySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. VitaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StewardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Com. v. Pennington, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Com. v. Piner, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API