Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Tlie opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
There is but one question involved in this appeal, which is from an order of Judge Featherstone’s sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the action is res ad judicata because of the decision in the case between the same parties reported in 159 S. C., 481, 157 S. E., 842, 846. The history of that case is that the plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the overflowing of its property by water backed over it by the embankment created by the State Highway Department in constructing and relocating Highway No.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGowanTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Ophuls & Hill, Inc. v. Carolina Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Griggs v. GriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Moseley v. WELCHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Coastal Mall, Inc. v. AskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Shonnard v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Alicia Pearson v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.