Legal Opinion

Shonnard v. South Carolina Public Service Authority

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 1950No. 16402PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukbs, Justice.

'Phis action by appellant for continuing damages to land is similar in alleged facts to the case of Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service Authority, 216 S. C. 500, 59 S. E. (2d) 132. The main conclusion of the cited decision is applicable to this case; it is the converse of a proceeding under the power of eminent domain by the condemnor for the assessment of the value of private property taken for a public purpose. “As we read the complaint, we think it is clear that it does properly allege a cause of action for the recovery by the plaintiff from the defendant,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Conestee Mills v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Lockhart Power Co. v. AskewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Cayce Land Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. City of Greenwood v. PsomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API