Malek v. Martin Marietta Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dk. 110). This is an action for retaliatory discharge for pursuing workers’ compensation benefits and for discriminatory discharge and failure to rehire because of a physical handicap. The defendant seeks summary judgment on all claims.
A court grants a motion for summary judgment if a genuine issue of material fact does not exist and if the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2511, 91…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ricks v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- United States v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy Florida 32351District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- American Management Services, LLC v. Department of ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Cease v. Safelite Glass Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Lyden v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.