State ex rel. Gross v. Board of Directors Miami Conservancy District
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
PLEADINGS AND CLAIMS OF THE PARTIES
Plaintiff, who is the owner of, and pays an annual assessment of benefits otherwise known as the Miami Conservancy tax on, real property located within the confines of The. Miami Conservancy District, institutes this action to require the court, by virtue of §8820-40 GC, to mandamus the respondent directors of the aforesaid district to direct the Board of Appraisers of said district to, appraise the benefits or the enhanced benefits received by real property located throughout said district in all cases where it is evident that.any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Orr v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Elkins v. Millard County Drainage Dist. No. 3Utah Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Minnich v. CrabillOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krouser v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Wells v. DurossOhio Court of Appeals · 1977