Legal Opinion

Wells v. Duross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1977No. 36442PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPuyatel, J.

On July 2, 1973, the Council of the city of Lyndhurst, Ohio, passed Resolution Number 73-47, declaring it necessary to construct or repair sidewalks fronting certain parcels of land situated in its jurisdiction.

The defendants, Mr. John DuRoss and Mrs. Joan Du-Ross, appellants herein, received a notice from the city of Lyndhurst Building Department, Sidewalk Division, styled “Notice to Repair Sidewalk,” and dated July 5, 1973. The notice informed the appellants of the passage of the resolution of necessity. It further notified them that they were required to repair, replace or relay certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglass v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. State Ex Rel. Gross v. Board of Directors of Miami Conservancy Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Mallo v. Village of DoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Gross v. Board of Directors Miami Conservancy DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. G. Andrews Espy Realty Co. v. Burton-Rodgers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SlocumAkron Municipal Court · 1981
  2. Williams v. City of Highland HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API