Legal Opinion
Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 12, 2003No. 01-1585PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Biomet, Inc. appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1 granting Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo post-judgment interest from August 6, 1996 on his punitive damages award. We conclude that interest on this part of the judgment runs from the date of the district court’s Fourth Amended Final Judgment, July 27, 2001, entered after appellate reversal of the reduction in punitive damages.
DISCUSSION
In Dr. Tronzo’s suit against Biomet the jury rendered special verdicts of patent infringement, fraud, and breach of confidential…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The West Bend Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette Inc. v. American Coalition of Life ActivistsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- SEB S.A. v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.