Fox v. Giaccia
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
This employment discrimination case arises from the termination of the plaintiffs employment in January 2003. Defendant Chadbourne & Parke LLP’s Statement of Facts as to Which There is No Genuine Issue (“Def s Facts”) ¶¶ 1, 112. This action was brought initially against the law firm where the plaintiff had been employed, Chadbourne & Parke, LLP, and individual employees of the firm. In a previous ruling, the Court dismissed the individual defendants and all claims against the law firm except those brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- St. John v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees Local 2401 v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Stone v. Landis Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Aftergood v. National Reconnaissance OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.