Legal Opinion
Kellogg v. Woods
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 12, 2006No. A05-1837PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court entered judgment against William Woods for violating the mandatory-disclosure requirements for individual sewage-treatment systems set forth in MinmStat. § 115.55, subd. 6 (2004). Woods appeals, arguing that the district court misinterpreted the statute, that the record does not support the district court’s findings that the system was noncompliant when he sold the property and that he had reason to know of the noncompliance, and that the district court improperly limited damages for the septic-system inspector’s breach of contract. Because the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Yost v. MillhouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Njema v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Marriage of Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Feed Management Systems, Inc. v. Comco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- JEM ACRES, LLC v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Sayer v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.