Legal Opinion

Tatum v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1894PublishedCited by 23 opinions

jError to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Yalliant, Judge. (1) The evidence establishes that the land sued for was created by accretion to the Missouri shore of the river.

Read the full summary

jError to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Yalliant, Judge. (1) The evidence establishes that the land sued for was created by accretion to the Missouri shore of the river. Campbell v. Laclede Co., 84 Mo. 372; St. Clair County v. Livingston, 23 "Wall. 66; St. Louis v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 13; St. Louis v. Lemp, 93 Mo. 477; Public Schools v. Risley, 40 Mo. 356; Le Beau v. Gaven, 37 Mo. 556; Smith v. Public Schools, 30 Mo. 290; Benson v. Morrow, 61 Mo. 345; Jones v. Soulard, 24 How. 41. (2) The title under the Brazeau concession extended to the Mississippi river on the east and covered…

1Opinion of the CourtMacfarlane, J.

The action is ejectment to recover possession of a parcel of land in the city of St. Louis fronting three hundred and ninety-eight feet on the Mississippi river, and having a depth back of three hundred and seven feet. The land is claimed by the city as part of its public wharf. The answer was a general denial and a plea of the statutes of limitation. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and a verdict and judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff appealed.

Plaintiff claims title through concessions made to Joseph Brazeau, and confirmation thereof by act of congress in 1836.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Cooley v. GoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Baker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Fuhr v. DeanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  5. Naylor v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Brundage v. KnoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Forgeus v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API