Legal Opinion
In Re AS.H.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 2004No. 99-FS-619PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
This juvenile delinquency case is more than five years old. On January 20, 1999, following a factfinding hearing, As.H., then sixteen years of age,1 was adjudicated guilty of robbery. The sole evidence implicating As.H. in the offense was the testimony of the victim, Ms. Michal Freedhoff, who identified As.H. at a photo array almost a month after the robbery and again in court more than four months after that. Ms. Freedhoff described her level of certainty on both occasions, however, as “seven or eight” on a scale of one to ten. Because Ms. Freedhoff was obviously…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- United States v. Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Benn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Odemns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re L.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Steward v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.