Legal Opinion
Steward v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2007No. 03-CF-1124, 06-CO-393PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
In the first of these consolidated cases, appellant Reginald Steward seeks reversal of his conviction on a single count of distribution of heroin, arguing insufficiency of the evidence. In the second case, he contends that the trial court erred in denying, without a hearing, his motion, brought pursuant to D.C.Gode § 23-110 and Super. Ct. Crim. R. 33, in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel and sought a new trial. We have no trouble concluding that the evidence at trial was sufficient to sustain the jury’s guilty verdict. We agree with appellant,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Strozier v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dorsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Shepherd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.