Legal Opinion

Sapiano v. Williamsburg National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1994No. B074441PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

This declaratory relief action construes a subrogation clause in a commercial vehicle insurance policy. The trial court held the insurer cannot assert its contractual right to repayment from the insured’s recovery against the third party tortfeasor, because the total amount available from the insurance and the third party is insufficient to compensate the full loss suffered by the insured. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

The facts were stipulated below. Plaintiff and respondent Anthony R. Sapiano is the insured under a vehicle insurance policy issued by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Chase v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Security National Insurance v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Ass'n of California Health & Welfare Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Carson v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API