Korslund v. Troup
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kalin, J. †
— Respondent and appellant played as doubles partners on a handball team representing the Tacoma Elks Lodge in a league. Both parties participated in handball for its recreational benefits. They were not paid for playing and the leagues were similar to bowling leagues. The lodge, in order to compete in the league, had to enter two doubles teams of two players each and one singles player. On this particular occasion, respondent and appellant had signed up to play a doubles match against the Washington Athletic Club of Seattle. While appellant was driving his car to Seattle, with…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Paulson v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Moen v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Finn v. DrtinaWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Wines v. Engineers Ltd. Pipeline Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hulse v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Meabon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Knisely v. Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Meabon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970