Legal Opinion

Moen v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1940No. 27710PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted action to recover from defendant sums of money his assignor, P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, had been compelled to pay as the result of litigation concerning an automobile accident.

We briefly state the pertinent portions of the com plaint as follows: That November 19, 1933, defendant insurance company issued to P. F. Collier & Son Corporation a policy of liability insurance, by the terms of which it insured P. F. Collier & Son Corporation against loss sustained by it as the result of damage caused by the operation of automobiles owned, operated, or hired by its employees.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. White v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cook v. SeidenvergWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gleason v. Metropolitan Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. Coates v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Manos v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pence v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API