Moen v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
Plaintiff instituted action to recover from defendant sums of money his assignor, P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, had been compelled to pay as the result of litigation concerning an automobile accident.
We briefly state the pertinent portions of the com plaint as follows: That November 19, 1933, defendant insurance company issued to P. F. Collier & Son Corporation a policy of liability insurance, by the terms of which it insured P. F. Collier & Son Corporation against loss sustained by it as the result of damage caused by the operation of automobiles owned, operated, or hired by its employees.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- White v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cook v. SeidenvergWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Gleason v. Metropolitan Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Coates v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Manos v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Pence v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.