Legal Opinion

Wines v. Engineers Ltd. Pipeline Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1957No. 34316, 34317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This appeal involves two independent suits, arising out of a single automobile collision, consolidated for the purposes of trial and appeal. These actions were tried before the court sitting with a jury and resulted in verdicts and judgments in favor of each respondent.

Respondent Wines, the daughter of respondent Little, for several months prior to June 9,1955, had been residing with her father at his home, located northeast of Bellingham near the intersection of Kelly (east-west) and Hannegan (north-south) roads.

Shortly before 8 o’clock p.m., on the date above mentioned, respondents left the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Pryor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Farrow v. OstromWashington Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Carle v. McChord Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Blaak v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pancoast v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Korslund v. TroupWashington Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API