Legal Opinion

Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. Carter

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 20, 1978No. 77-C-1135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

COSTANTINO, District Judge.

This is an action to set aside two Orderly Marketing Agreements (“OMAs”) negotiated by the Special Trade Representative (“STR”) pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-618, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1978, 19 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. (“the Act”). The agreements were negotiated with the governments of Taiwan and South Korea, and they deal with the number of pairs of non-rubber athletic footwear that those two countries will export to the United States.

The plaintiffs are, respectively, a retailer, wholesaler and importer of the type of footwear…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alberto v. Toyota Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. No Oilport! v. CarterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1981
  3. State v. Beloit Concrete Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Monti v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API