Legal Opinion

Faheem-El v. Klincar

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 4, 1984No. 84 C 2561PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kareem Faheem-el brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated. He attacks the parole revocation procedures in Illinois. Specifically, he attacks the adequacy of the preliminary parole revocation hearings, the constitutionality of the state’s refusal to grant bail or service credit to accused parole violators, and the timeliness of final parole revocation hearings. Before the court are plaintiff’s motions for class certification and a preliminary injunction.

I.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Faheem-El v. KlincarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Kenneth Hanson v. Jon HeckelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Graham v. Security Savings & LoanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. Walters v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Robinson v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API