Legal Opinion
Faheem-El v. Klincar
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 25, 1988No. 85-3008PublishedCited by 181 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge,
with whom BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, CUDAHY, POSNER and COFFEY, Circuit Judges, join.
Under Illinois law, parolees arrested on new criminal charges are not considered for bail on these charges pending the outcome of their final parole revocation hearing. Plaintiff Kareem Faheem-El challenged this procedure on behalf of himself and those similarly situated. The district court certified a statewide class of parolees arrested on new criminal charges and granted a preliminary injunction requiring the state of Illinois to consider members of the plaintiff class for bail.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Am General Corporation and General Motors Corporation v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Platinum Home Mortgage Corporation v. Platinum Financial Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Stephen N. Roth, M.D. v. Lutheran General Hospital, Jerome Kraut, M.D., Seymour Metrick, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Hamilton v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.