Legal Opinion

Tiefel Bros. Winn v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Parmer .County; D. B. Hill, Judge. Actions by Tiefel Bros. & Winn against Thomas Maxwell which were consolidated. From a judgment for defendant on his cross-complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

The appellants, Tiefel Bros. & Winn, instituted two suits in the district court of Parmer county, against the appellee, Maxwell, numbered, respectively, 111 and 112, upon the docket of that court In cause No. Ill, appellants alleged the ownership in them of certain cattle, and that they were entitled to the possession of same, and that the property was in the possession of the defendant, Maxwell, praying for the title and possession of same; In cause No. 112, against the same defendant, the action of plaintiffs was based upon a promissory note, and a chattel mortgage, securing said note, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luedde v. HooperTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Knox v. McElroyTexas Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. El Paso Electric Ry. Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Texas Co. v. VelozCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n of Texas v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Imperial Irr. Co. v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Cain v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API