Legal Opinion

Amerisure Insurance v. Plumb

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 2009No. Docket 276384PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtK. F. Kelly, J.

In this no-fault insurance case, defendant/cross-defendant/counterplaintiff/cross-plaintiff Rae Louise Plumb appeals1 the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of plaintiff/ counterdefendant Amerisure Insurance Company, and the order denying Plumb’s motion for reconsideration, *420which ultimately denied Plumb personal protection insurance (PIP)2 benefits. The issue raised on appeal requires us to determine the requisite showing a claimant must make under MCL 500.3113(a) in order to obtain PIP benefits. We affirm and hold that § 3113(a) precludes PIP benefits when a motor…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lytle v. MaladyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Barnett v. HidalgoMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Woods v. SLB Property Management, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Rambin v. Allstate Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. AFP Specialties, Inc. v. VereykenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API