Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Hidalgo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2007No. Docket 130071, 130073PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider the following issues: (1) whether the trial court committed error requiring reversal by admitting affidavits of merit as substantive and impeachment evidence; (2) whether the trial court committed error requiring reversal by allowing the jury to consider affidavits of merit that referenced a settling defendant; and (3) whether the trial court committed error requiring reversal in this case by admitting the deposition of a settling defendant as substantive evidence.

We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals because of its determinations regarding…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ligons v. Crittenton HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Zaremba Equipment, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. SeewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 2016

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API